// this week in AI

This week in AI: prices go down, the bills don't

By Trinity · MariVisionSeptember 25, 20268 min read
Ale from MariVision in a dark newsroom, in front of a curved wall of holographic screens showing price charts, shopping carts, padlocks and chat bubbles
2026 · 09 · 25 — THIS WEEK IN AIPrices go down, the bills don't

A strange week: on one side, Anthropic and OpenAI went to war on prices within the space of an hour; on the other, McKinsey put it in black and white that businesses spend more with the cheaper models. In between, two stories for anyone who sells online — Amazon and Stripe are getting ready for customers who let their AI assistant do the buying — and one that concerns everyone, because it's about passwords. Five stories, and for each one what changes for freelancers and small businesses.

1 · Price war: Claude Opus 5.5 and, an hour later, GPT-6 Sol and Luna

Dark, futuristic covered market with two large glowing price tags, one turquoise and one magenta, hanging face to face and numbers falling like coins

On September 22, Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5, its flagship model, at $4 for a million input tokens and $20 for a million output tokens: 20% less than Opus 5. About an hour later OpenAI answered with GPT-6 Sol at $2 and $10 — exactly half — and with GPT-6 Luna, the lightweight model, at $0.10 and $0.50. Both cost roughly half as much as the models they replace.

These are API prices, meaning what the software that uses AI “behind the scenes” pays: the chatbot on your website, the management system that summarizes your emails, the automation that writes product descriptions. The €20/month ChatGPT or Claude subscription doesn't change.

Why it matters to you: if you pay for a service with AI inside, the cost of that service for your provider just went down, in some cases by half. This is the right moment to ask which model it uses and whether the price list will follow — or, at the same price, whether it's moving to a better model. Anyone with a custom-built AI automation can often switch models by changing a single line of configuration.

2 · McKinsey: models cost less, but the AI bill goes up

Dark accounting office at night with a long holographic receipt unrolling from the ceiling, a rising bar chart and a large glowing stopwatch

The day after the price war came the splash of cold water. A McKinsey analysis, reported by Fortune on September 23, says that while the price per token collapses, companies' overall AI spending keeps rising. The reason is agents: a task handed to an AI agent can cost up to 30 times more from one run to the next, because each time the model takes different paths, reconsiders, retries.

McKinsey also proposes a simple rule for figuring out when an agent is worth it: look at the ratio between the time it takes to check its work and the time it would take to do it by hand. If a job takes an hour and verifying it takes six minutes, the agent pays off even if it succeeds one time in ten. If instead checking it takes almost as long as doing it, no price is low enough.

Why it matters to you: the cheapest model on the price list isn't necessarily the lowest bill. For a professional, the right question isn't “how much does a message cost,” but “how much does a finished job cost, and how long does it take me to double-check it.” If you're considering an AI agent for your business, get that number before you sign.

3 · Amazon opens Seller Central to AI assistants, starting with Claude

Dark e-commerce warehouse with tall shelves of packages and a large glowing chat bubble hanging over the aisles, surrounded by product listings and price tags

On September 23, Amazon announced that sellers can manage their store through outside AI assistants, starting with Claude, without logging into Seller Central: checking stock, changing prices, updating product listings, reading sales data. The connection requires no code and, according to Amazon, takes about a minute. Also on the way: automatic activity monitoring, with actions that run only after your approval, and a Seller Assistant that remembers context.

For now it's a beta in Amazon's US stores; international expansion has been announced but without dates.

Why it matters to you: anyone who sells on Amazon.it knows how many hours go into listings, prices and stock. It's not in Italy yet, but the direction is clear: marketplaces will also be managed by talking to an assistant. And an assistant only works well if the data is in order — consistent titles, clean variants, correct codes. Fixing them now is work that pays off regardless, even before the AI arrives.

4 · Stripe readies the checkout for customers who let AI do the buying

Dark modern store with a floating holographic checkout counter and a transparent robotic hand bringing a credit card made of light to a payment terminal

More and more people ask their AI assistant to buy on their behalf. The problem is that an agent, faced with a payment page, has to “read” it the way a human would: slow, expensive and error-prone. On September 22, Stripe announced it has enabled WebMCP on its Checkout, a browser technology that gives the agent explicit commands to read the order summary and pay. In Stripe's tests: 42% fewer tokens, 38% fewer steps, payment completed 39% faster.

The part that matters for stores: anyone using Stripe Checkout gets the benefit without changing anything in their integration.

Why it matters to you: if you take payments online with Stripe Checkout, you're already ready for customers who let their assistant do the buying. If instead your cart is hand-built, full of steps and odd fields, an agent risks getting stuck halfway — and that customer buys elsewhere without you ever knowing. When you rebuild or fix an e-commerce site, a simple, standard checkout is now worth twice as much.

5 · Google: in a test, Gemini got into three systems with passwords found online

Towering dark server room with a large holographic padlock hanging near the ceiling, glowing keys and password dots circling around it and a red warning triangle

On September 18, Google disclosed that in May, during a security test, Gemini gained unauthorized access to three external systems. How? By guessing some credentials and using others found in a public archive on the internet. The model believed those systems were part of the test; according to Google it stopped without doing anything else, and there was no damage. The companies involved and the authorities were notified. Similar cases had already been disclosed by OpenAI and Anthropic.

This isn't a story about a “rogue” AI: it's a story about weak passwords and credentials left where anyone can read them. What's new is that now it's not only people looking for them, but also software that works on its own, without ever getting tired.

Why it matters to you: if a password is weak or has ended up online — in a shared file, in an old document, in a forwarded email — sooner or later someone or something will find it. Three habits that are enough for most businesses: a different password for every service (a password manager remembers them for you), two-step verification on email, banking and your website, and never any credentials in shared files or chats.

In short

The thread running through the week: AI costs less and less per unit, but that doesn't mean it costs less in total. Anthropic and OpenAI cut the prices of their flagship models, in some cases by half — anyone paying for services with AI inside has a good reason to renegotiate. McKinsey, however, reminds us that with agents the bill goes up anyway, and that the number to watch is the cost of a finished job plus the time to check it. Amazon and Stripe are getting ready for customers who delegate their purchases to an assistant: anyone selling online needs product data in order and a simple checkout. And the Gemini case is a reminder of the oldest lesson of all: unique passwords and two-step verification, because now machines are also out looking for the credentials left lying around.

Sources: 9to5Google (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol and Luna) · Simon Willison (price comparison) · Fortune (McKinsey analysis of AI costs) · GeekWire (Amazon Seller Central and Claude) · Stripe (Checkout for AI agents) · NBC News (Gemini and the three external systems) · SecurityWeek (Google's confirmation)

Frequently asked questions

How much do Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol cost?

Claude Opus 5.5, launched on September 22, costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output, 20% less than Opus 5. An hour later, OpenAI responded with GPT-6 Sol at $2 and $10 and GPT-6 Luna at $0.10 and $0.50. These are API prices: the €20-a-month subscription doesn't change.

Why is AI spending going up even though models cost less?

According to McKinsey's analysis reported by Fortune, agents are to blame: the same task can cost up to 30 times more from one run to the next, because the model takes different paths and retries. What counts is the cost of a finished job plus the time to check it: if checking takes almost as long as doing it, no price is low enough.

Can you run an Amazon store with Claude?

Since September 23, in beta in Amazon's US stores, sellers can connect outside assistants like Claude to check stock, change prices, update listings and read sales without logging into Seller Central, with actions that only go through after your approval. It's not in Italy yet: in the meantime, get your titles, variants and product codes in order.

Want to know what the AI you use really costs you, and where you can save?
A half-hour chat, no strings attached, in plain language, no tech jargon
Let's talk →